"And today will be better than yesterday."--Buster Olney

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

60 Minutes: N.Y.'s Archbishop Timothy Dolan


In the past decade, the Catholic Church in America has encountered its fair share of problems; with same-sex marriage rising, falling numbers in those entering the priesthood, and sexual abuse scandals, many in the church are losing faith.

Insert New York's Archbishop Timothy Dolan. The charismatic, overweight, staunch conservative is the leader of the biggest Catholic market in the U.S., New York. He resides over 2.2 million Catholics and is trying to change things for the church.

While the story is a good one, religion isn't something I'm particularly fond of talking about. It's a subject that pins people against each other, building barriers and creating tension. But, this story is just another fine example of feature journalism by 60 Minutes.

This story does a couple of great things that have become characteristics of great reporting by CBS' best news show: First, great natural sounds. To prove that someone is charismatic, don't you have to hear that they are just that? Seeing interaction between Dolan and his followers is exactly what you need to prove the true personality behind this mind. To see the relationships he has built with politicians, churchgoers, celebrities, and other high-ranking officials in the church is exactly what the story needed to prove his charm. Next, the overhead shots, as well as the low angled shots provide quality b-roll that helps show the devout nature with which he preaches. Finally, I think that Morley Safer asked some tough questions, and Dolan didn't shy away from them. A lot of people in Dolan's position may beat around the bush when it comes to questions about sex scandals in the church, but by Safer asking them in insightful and respectful ways, the viewers get to hear what Dolan has to say about a very serious issue.

I did have one problem with the story, and this may just be personal preference, but I had a problem listening to Morley Safer throughout the entire piece. His voice at an older age can be tough to listen to in some spots and became, at times, distracting to me. He is obviously a great journalist; no one is debating that. I just thought his voicing could have been better used to keep the focus on the story and not on himself. Maybe by adding more soundbites or staying away from similar sounds back-to-back, Safer could have had a better effect with his voice.

To see this story, check out: 60 Minutes Online

No comments:

Post a Comment